About
Horse Floats Repairs
Horse Float Servicing
Show Jump Wings
Rider Instruction
Friends
Pony Camps
Articles
Contact Us
News
Download
Training challenges
Training challenges 2
Horse Truck Photos
e-mail me

Articles


Articles by Portland Jones

These articles by Portland Jones have been published in Hoofbeats Magazine and are reproduced here with the kind permission of Sandy Hannan, editor. For more information on Australia's best riding, training and horse care magazine please go to www.hoofbeats.com.au

2249.jpg

Xenophon

 

When you read “On Horsemanship” Xenophon’s voice is so clear that it is almost as if you are sitting beside the retired cavalry general while he writes in a sunny spot in his garden. He wrote the book when he was 73 years old and approaching the end of his life but his wits are sharp and his wisdom clear on every page. I picture him pausing in his writing to look over to the stables and his stallions, remembering with gratitude their years of service. Perhaps he wrote this book for his sons and grandsons, to help them during a time in history when a man in battle trusted his horse with his life. Although he lived by the sword his voice is that of a scholar. The way he talks about horses reminds us that while our world is vastly different from his, the horses we work with are still the same. While none of us will go to war bareback on a stallion as Xenophon did his book is as valuable today as it was nearly 2500 years ago when he wrote it. Some of the details may be archaic but the underlying principles of tact and understanding are as important as they ever were. Xenophon lived in Ancient Greece; a remarkable man in an era that left the world with many new concepts and ideas including; democracy, philosophy, mathematics and physics. The Greeks were educated, restrained and ethical. They had a great love of beauty and believed in the pursuit of excellence. The gods that they worshipped were strict, unforgiving and required a great deal of attention; the Olympic games were started as a way of honouring (and placating) their chief god Zeus. One of the most important Greek artefacts is the Shrine of Delphi and on it are inscribed two statements that epitomise the Greek philosophy; they are, “Nothing in excess” and “Know thyself”. Its hard to imagine what the Greeks would think of modern ethics, values and the ‘super-size me, bigger is better’ philosophy! One of the most famous Greeks of that era was Socrates (469 – 399 BC). The two fundamental beliefs that Socrates taught his students were the necessity of doing what they believed was right even in the face of fierce opposition and the need to pursue knowledge relentlessly. Xenophon was a friend, a student and an admirer of Socrates. When Socrates was sentenced to death (by drinking a cup of hemlock) for “neglect of the gods” he refused to allow his many friends to help him escape by saying that he could not “return evil for evil” and that he must respect the processes of the law. Xenophon wrote a book defending Socrates and although he must have missed his friend he wrote, “Excess of grief for the dead is madness; for it is an injury to the living, and the dead know it not.” “On Horsemanship” was one of about forty essays and short books that Xenophon wrote throughout his life. He wrote on a number of different topics including war and military history. His most famous book is “Anabasis” which tells the true story of one of his many military campaigns. When he was 31 years old he went to war as a mercenary for Cyrus the Younger against his older brother Artaxerxes II. The Greeks won but Cyrus and his general were killed, leaving 10,000 Greek mercenaries in Mesopotamia, far from home and deep in enemy territory. They chose new leaders, of which Xenophon was one, and battled their way to the Black Sea and safety. It has been said of Anabasis that reading it is memorable because, “The feeling of the comfortable, quiet brain of General Xenophon who was never unduly disturbed or despondent and who always know what to do and how to do it.” (Ford Madox Ford 1938). Xenophon was exiled from Athens later in his life for his association with Cyrus but his banishment was revoked when one of his sons Gryllus fought and died for Athens at the battle of Mantinea. Like others of his era Xenophon rode only stallions as it was believed they were braver than mares. Although the Greeks wore extensive leather armour into battle they did most of their every-day riding dressed only in a short-skirted tunic. Xenophon writes of the importance of training the horse to stand quietly while the rider adjusts his skirts and takes a firm grasp of his spear. The ancient Greeks rode bareback, with the possible addition of a light cloth to sit on, as the saddle was yet to be invented. As Xenophon does not mention wearing armoured underpants it is not at all surprising that he advocated choosing horses with fleshy, well-covered backs! Xenophon dedicates several pages of his book to the management of a horse’s feet. The Greeks did not have farriers, so daily hoof care would have been extremely important. He writes, “Just as a house would be of little use, however beautiful its upper stories, if the underlying foundations were not what they ought to be, so there is little use to be extracted from a horse…if unsound in his feet, however excellent his other points; since he could not turn a single one of them to good account.” He suggests buying horses with thick-walled feet, writing that a good foot can be determined by the sound it makes as it hits the ground as a strong foot with a well defined frog will, “ring like a cymbal against the solid earth.” Xenophon is concerned with training the horse for war, cross country riding and parades. His horsemanship is based on the need for obedience as this was of the utmost importance to the soldier. The Greeks rode their horses on a long rein and with a rather high head carriage; with the neck possibly helping stabilise the rider in the absence of a saddle. He emphasises the beauty of a horse that is spirited yet obedient and discusses ways in which the rider can achieve the desired arched neck. He writes, “ If you desire to handle a good war-horse so as to make his action the more magnificent and striking, you must refrain from pulling at his mouth with the bit as well as from spurring and whipping him…but if you teach your horse to go with a light hand on the bit and get him to hold his head well up and arch his neck you will be making him do just what the animal himself glories and delights in.” Although “On Horsemanship” is often referred to as a dressage book it was written before horse training became a leisure time activity. Nevertheless the book serves to remind us that the sport of dressage evolved out of the training of horses for war, even though Xenophon would hardly recognise in today’s dressage tests the movements that he trained his own horses to perform. Xenophon valued lightness of the aids and fair treatment of the horse above all else. He writes, “for what the horse does under compulsion…is done without understanding; and there is no beauty in it either, any more than if one should spur and whip a dancer.” It is interesting just how much of Xenophon’s advice is relevant to modern riders. He writes that a man should sit on a horse, not as if seated on a chair but as if standing upright with legs apart. He stresses the importance of progressive suppling exercises including voltes and at all he times counsels riders to encourage the horse with tact and gentleness. He understood very clearly the need for breaks within a training session; stating that, “It is the best of lessons if the horse gets a season of repose whenever he has behaved to his rider’s satisfaction.” It is also interesting to note how clearly Xenophon understands the principles of psychology even though, as a discipline, it was developed over 2000 years after his time. He clearly demonstrates the principle of negative reinforcement (pressure / release) and the value of the release of the aid when he writes, “The horse’s mouth is not to be pulled back too harshly so as to make him toss his head aside, nor yet so gently that he will not feel the pressure. But the instant he raises his neck in answer to the pull, give him the bit at once; and so throughout, as we never cease repeating, at every response to your wishes, whenever and wherever the animal performs his service well, reward and humour him.” He also demonstrates the principle of classical conditioning (during which a previously meaningless cue becomes associated with a learnt response or reflex) when he describes how certain noises are used to either soothe or rouse the horse but that these noises are a function of the horse’s training and have no natural effect on their own. He writes, “Again it should be known that the conventional “chirrup” to quiet and “cluck” to rouse a horse are a sort of precept of the training school; and supposing any one from the beginning chose to soft soothing actions with the “cluck” sound and harsh rousing actions with the “chirrup” the horse could be taught to rouse himself at the “chirrup” and to calm himself at the “cluck”. When reading “On Horsemanship” it is sometimes necessary to remind yourself that it was written nearly 2500 years ago because some of the instructions in the book could easily have come straight from a modern pony-club manual. As an example, this is how Xenophon recommends putting the bit into the horse’s mouth. “In order to insert the bit correctly the groom should, in the first place, approach on the near side of the horse…raise the headstall in his right hand and with his left present the bit…if he refuses to open his mouth the groom must hold the bit against the teeth and at the same time insert the thumb of his left hand inside the horse’s jaws. Most horses will open their mouths to that operation.” However, Xenophon’s most important piece of advice for riders, and what he refers to as the golden rule, is that no one should attempt to train the horse when they are angry. He points out that anger is without reason and it will drive a person to do things that they will regret when they have calmed down. “On Horsemanship” reminds us that as modern riders we inherit nearly 25 centuries of tradition and technique. We can marvel at the understanding and compassion of a man who lived as a mercenary but who still cared deeply for the physical and mental well-being of his horses. If it reminds us of the transience of our own existence it also serves to make us ask what will remain of this era in 2500 years time. And finally it reminds us that no matter how much our world has changed and will change in the future, horses are a constant; we must be ethical custodians of the horse for we hold its future in trust for those generations still to come.


2023.jpg

Float Loading

April/May 08 It’s easy to spot the difficult floater in the car park at the local horse show. The car and float are surrounded by a bevy of onlookers all armed to the teeth with lunge ropes, carrots, new age halters and sage advice, while a mushroom cloud of dust hangs ominously overhead. Meanwhile the star of the show stands firmly, if somewhat sweatily planted to terra firma. Although the distance the horse is required to walk from the base of the ramp to the front of the float may only be 3 or 4 metres in total it may as well be the distance from Perth to Brisbane as no amount of cajoling, bribery or threats will induce those precious forward steps. Sometimes it seems as if horses refuse to load onto the float because of a perverse sense of humour. The email they would send to their friends is not hard to imagine. Cost of float: $10,000. Cost of four wheel drive to tow it: $60,000. Cost of riding club membership, including uniforms and matching saddle blanket: $400. Watching the whole family run around for two hours while I stand on the ramp: Priceless! But in reality, the horse that refuses to load is simply demonstrating a gap in his basic training. Repairing these gaps can be reasonably straight forward as long as there is recognition of the fact that to be effective training must be systematic, repeatable and progressive. Good training takes time and sometimes a great deal of time. Miracle cures and five minute solutions rarely last. Training a horse is a little bit like growing a garden; the more it is tended over the years, the better it will be and the more it will withstand hardships. In horse training, as in life, the six P’s are of the utmost importance… Proper Preparation Prevents P**s Poor Performance. Before attempting float training or retraining, ensure the horse’s basic groundwork responses are really reliable (see the previous articles -Template for Good Behaviour - Vol 29 No 4; Ground Work Basics - Vol 29 No 3; Horses Behaving Badly - Vol 29 No 2. Horses that fail to load consistently are doing nothing more than advertising the fact that their training has been inadequate at some stage. Floating is just leading and horses that lead perfectly will lead on and off the float. Horses that fail to load consistently are doing nothing more than advertising the fact that their training has been inadequate at some stage. Floating is just leading and once horses have been taught to lead properly they will lead on and off the float. April/May 08 - Page 38 Although it is often possible to rustle up a posse of beefy helpers to wrestle the reluctant horse onto the float it is best not to rely on this method, as there are few volunteers at 4am when emergency trips to the vet are necessary or when bushfires threaten the paddocks. The float training method in this article is for a single handler, so politely ask all onlookers to stay well away. SAFETY FIRST As with all horse training, the safety of the handler and the horse must be the highest priority at all times, so ensure there are no sharp edges or rusty corners on the float that could cause injury and that the ramp is covered in a non-slip surface. During training, park the float on a level surface (attached to the tow ball of your car!) In an area free from hazards and safely fenced. Close all gates as Murphy’s Law dictates that the day this is not done will be the day the geriatric 9hh lead-line pony has a sudden ‘wild stallion’ moment and gallops off down the street. Although over-reach and brushing boots can prevent injury during training and floating, be wary of over-large float boots that may slip and impede the horse’s natural gaits. Remove all rugs so the aids can be easily given and clearly felt by the horse. Continue to do this before every float trip until the horse is totally reliable, or If your float is more like a pumpkin than a carriage fit for a princess the time to repair it is before you start training. The floating trainee can be fitted with brushing and over-reach boots for leg protection and outfitted in a bridle, anti-rearing bit or head collar for the training session. The initial float training can be done in a bridle, anti-rearing bit or head-collar, depending on the horse’s basic training and temperament. However, once the horse is consistently loading it is preferable to use a simple head-collar as bits - especially anti- rearing bits - can catch on almost any projection with disastrous consequences. If a bit is required then be even more vigilant about float safety and swap the bridle for a standard head-collar once the horse is safely enclosed in the float. CHECK GROUNDWORK RESPONSES The first stage - and for some horses this may take several sessions - is to ensure the groundwork responses that the horse gives in close proximity to the float are as light and reliable as those given when the float is no where in sight. Forward, stop and park are the most important responses in this instance but continue with the training until perfect control of all four legs is consistently achieved. Dressage riders obsess over rhythm but it is an aspect of ground- work training that is often neglected. Horses breathe in time to the rhythm of their legs, therefore a quick rhythm is intrinsically related to fear in the horse so don’t allow any quickening steps to creep in unless they have been asked for with an aid. Ensure the horse does not alter his rhythm when moving away from the float in particular, as quickening steps away from something only serve to reinforce, and therefore make stronger, fear responses. It’s useful to break down training tasks into their simplest component parts as this makes floating seem like a very simple task. Float loading requires the horse to walk forwards and backwards on command, in a given rhythm and to be able to ‘park’ (see training details in Ground Work Basics - Vol 29 No 3). At every stage of training, make haste slowly. The training process will take as long as it takes and rushing very rarely achieves anything other than frustration and delay. The six main responses (forward, stop, turn shoulders right and left, yield hind quarters right and left) used in this training session will become a blueprint for every single interaction between horse and handler, so make sure they are reliable. It’s worthwhile mentioning here that there can be a couple of aids (sometimes even more) for every behaviour but only ever one behaviour for every aid. For example, forward steps on the ground can be asked for by applying forward pressure on the head-collar (or bridle) and also by tapping either the left or right shoulder (i.e. one behaviour, three different aids) but never make tapping the left shoulder sometimes mean come forward and sometimes mean move sideways. This is far too confusing Above: Check the horse’s responses to aids are light and reliable while in close proximinity to the float. The rules must stay the same all the time. Float training involves only three or four steps from the base of the ramp into the float so, with that in mind, the horse can be asked to step onto the ramp by applying pressure on the head-collar in a forwards direction. If there is no response the groundwork encouragement techniques can be applied – tapping the horse’s shoulder with the whip, increasing in strength until he complies. Sometimes the tapping may have to be quite strong. The most important aspect of this technique is that the tapping stops the instant the horse’s legs move forwards. If the horse runs backwards the tapping would continue, increasing in strength, until it moves forwards and then the tapping ceases immediately. The rapidity of the taps should be at least two taps per second and this should not stop until the horse moves forwards. WALKING UP The float divider can be secured to one side so it creates a wider partition for the first stage of loading, and the breeching doors checked to ensure they will not swing shut in the middle of the session. As this stage of training usually doesn’t involve closing these doors they could even be removed altogether. At any stage, if a horse reacts to the training by rearing. becoming dangerous in any way or the handler does not feel confident, then it is advisable to seek help from a professional trainer. The safety of both horse and handler are the first priority in every situation. The horse may possibly stop after taking the first step onto the float ramp. This is fine. Don’t rush the next stage; when he is calm ask for another forward step. Taking this slowly allows the horse’s eyes time to adjust to the darker environment of the float. Resistance may occur when the second step forward is asked for and the horse may run backwards out of the float. The handler should be prepared to continue the tapping while he is running backwards but ceasing the instant the horse moves in a forwards direction again. The first step onto the ramp will probably need to start all over again after a resistant episode, but that’s OK. Remember, a journey of 1000 miles begins with a single step! Continue in this way until the horse comes forward when asked for the second step. When the horse does step right into the float the handler should not attempt to duck under the chest bar as the doors will not be closed at this stage so there is no need to get out of the way. Also, all the training so far has involved the handler being next to the horse and quite often the process of his handler disappearing under the bar can confuse him. Now is the time to offer a reward - a rub or carrot - and the security of the handler standing beside him. Backing out is the next step. Once the horse has stood a little while (maybe a minute or two) in the float ask him to back out. If he begins to run out, apply pressure on the head-collar and use the tapping technique until he stops. It’s very hard to prevent rushing off once its begun, so go back into the ground-work and make the forward response clearer if he shows any inclination towards this behaviour. When a horse rushes off the float or refuses to step forward it’s really important to keep his head facing the float. Don’t let him remove the float from his view because this is very reinforcing as effectively his previous behaviour has made the float “go away” and therefore has worked. Don’t turn him away in order to straighten the approach because it’s not necessary, he can step on from the side of the ramp if asked. It’s vital that both horse and handler master each stage before moving onto the next one. The June July issue will cover the next training stage of training, one which requires the horse to be in a head collar and the use of a two m rope as he learns to stand so the breeching doors can be closed by the handler. Keep the horse’s head facing the float at all times, if he rushes backwards then ask him to load from the side of the ramp instead of turning for a straight approach.

248.jpg

Horses Behaving Badly

The Human Influence Every horse has the potential for undesirable behaviours but why some seemingly sail through life with a halo firmly in place and why others appear to practice wicked deeds intent upon grievous bodily harm to their riders or handlers is a question that has plagued horse trainers for thousands of years. Recent advances in our understanding of equines have added a new dimension to the issue of them ‘behaving badly’ and it is now absolutely clear that inappropriate behaviour is not just bad for the trainer, but also bad for the horse. Science, therefore, has brought objectivity to a problem that dwells at the heart of our long association with the horse and it has focused on the common denominator that exists whenever a horse behaves incorrectly - the human. Horses are trained using negative reinforcement - that is, a pressure of the rider’s hands or legs that reinforces, by its removal, the correct behaviour. It is by using negative reinforcement that riders are able to control their horses’ speed and direction with light signals - this being called stimulus control. The path to stimulus control, however, can all too easily become a slippery slope leading to inappropriate behaviours of all kinds, such as bucking, rearing, bolting, pulling back and biting. These behaviours are not only dangerous for riders and handlers, but they have a significant impact on the horse’s welfare and greatly contribute to the high rate of ‘wastage’ in the industry. Studying Stop and Go Australian scientist and horse trainer, Dr Andrew McLean, has been examining the relationship between problem behaviours and the incorrect use of negative reinforcement for some time. He reasoned that if incorrectly applied negative reinforcement was responsible for problem The international debate on hyperflexion of the neck in dressage horses has generated a great deal of recent media attention. In an era in which public concern for the welfare of sporting and companion animals has never been greater, this issue has stirred the emotions of many and drawn the media spotlight unerringly upon the sport of dressage. There is however, much valuable research on the welfare of equines that goes largely unnoticed. Targeting Training Since the last decades of the twentieth century, the volume and quality of the research into horses has been steadily rising, with many researchers all around the world working on lower profile, but no less important, welfare issues. Several researchers are targeting training practices and their impact on welfare, with areas such as rein contact and self carriage being examined, as well as ‘problem’ or inappropriate behaviours such as rearing and bucking. Although this research covers wide and diverse horse-related topics, areas of consensus are certainly emerging. It is now generally believed, for example, that inappropriate training practices can have a significant, negative impact on equine welfare. This is particularly prevalent when a single aid is used to produce more than one behaviour (such as, when pulling on the reins is used to make a horse ‘rounder’) and careful attention is not paid to the release of the pressures used in negative reinforcement (for example, when ‘self carriage’ is not maintained). Trends could be seen in both the in-hand and under-saddle behaviours, which indicates that under-saddle problems can be detected through an in-hand diagnosis and vice versa. Dr McLean reasoned that if incorrectly applied negative reinforcement is associated with problem behaviours then it should follow that horses showing problem behaviours should also show some dysfunctions in the behaviours that were trained by negative reinforcement. In other words, their existing, basic training should exhibit problems or flaws. In 2004, Dr McLean conducted a study designed to determine if certain behaviour problems can be associated with the quality of a horse’s learned behaviours of stop and go; more correctly known as deceleration and acceleration. During this investigation, he analysed the ‘stop and go’ responses of a large sample of horses that exhibited problem behaviours, either in hand or under saddle. The horses included all breeds, all age groups and were predominantly geldings and mares. If the horse was asked to walk, it remained walking until signalled otherwise. Below: If halted, it should remain immobile without constant pressure on the reins. As it had been reasoned that ‘go’ and ‘stop’ were the most commonly used responses in a horse’s repertoire, with the largest impact on stimulus control, testing of these formed the basis of the study. A correct response was defined as the horse always responding correctly, initiating the response immediately from a light (not more than 200g pressure) signal and maintaining the response - that is, if the horse was asked to walk, it remained walking until signalled otherwise. If halted, it should remain immobile. The horses were subsequently assessed both in hand and under saddle. In-hand testing was carried out in a standard webbing headcollar with a lead rope attached as normal and with the handler facing the horse. The ‘go’ was tested by applying pressure on the lead rope in a forwards (from the horse) direction, then the horse’s response was analysed according to three criteria - that is, whether it was ‘sometimes delayed’, ‘delayed and heavy’ or not maintained. Each horse’s ‘stop’ was also tested and analysed using the same three criteria, then the whole process repeated five times. Under saddle, the horses were tested for ‘go’ by applying a light leg aid at halt until the horse walked, while the ‘stop’ was assessed by applying light rein pressure. Both were analysed using the same three criteria as the in-hand testing. In both the under saddle and in-hand trials, the handlers were very careful not to offer any other cues - such as voice or body movement - that could have acted as triggers for the ‘stop and go’ behaviours. The behaviours analysed were: bolting, rearing, bucking, shying, tension/jogging, no immobility (not standing still), head tossing, kicking out, biting, difficult to shoe, pulling back while tethered, refusal to load onto the float and rushing out of the float. Some behaviours were common to both in-hand and under-saddle, while others were specific to in-hand. Results The results of Dr McLean’s study showed that the relationship between incorrectly established ‘go’ and ‘stop’ responses was significant. For example, bolting horses showed far greater problems in their ‘stop’ response (71% of those tested showing significant dysfunctions), while rearing horses showed far greater problems in the ‘go’ response (70.4% of those tested showing significant dysfunctions). Horses that bucked showed dysfunctions in both ‘go’ and ‘stop’, while shying horses showed greater errors in ‘go’ than in the ‘stop’. Head-tossing horses showed more ‘stop’ than ‘go’ problems, while horses that kicked out in hand showed the reverse. Horses that were difficult to load onto a float showed more ‘go’ problems than those that bit, which showed slightly lower scores overall but with more problems in the ‘stop’ response than in the ‘go’. Of the ways in which the responses could be impaired, delayed and heavy responses were associated with the most problem behaviours. In correct training, responses should be made consistently, immediately, from light signals and maintained until otherwise cued. In equestrian literature, this is known as self carriage. When a response fulfils all of these criteria, it is said to be under stimulus control while, conversely, a loss of stimulus control is associated with problem behaviours. In his conclusions, Dr McLean suggested that tests such as those used in his study can be predictive of behavioural problems. He emphasised that, of all the ways a response can be dysfunctional, ‘delayed and heavy’ is associated with far more problem behaviours. Also of note was his proposal that ‘stop’ responses are related to more problem behaviours than ‘go’ responses and that, as there is a direct correlation between in-hand and under-saddle responses, any attempt to rectify problem behaviours (or maintain good ones!) should include both mounted and unmounted work. Perhaps most significantly, Dr McLean also recommended that any behaviour modification should begin with a simple assessment of the horse’s ‘go’ and ‘stop’ responses, as this will provide the trainer with a great deal of information about the direction that the training should take. In the study, there were no problem behaviours that showed no amount of dysfunction - that is, every problem behaviour tested was associated with problems in either the ‘go’ or ‘stop’ response and, in some cases, with both. Also, clear and consistent trends could be seen in both the in-hand and under-saddle behaviours, which indicates that under- saddle problems can be detected through an in-hand diagnosis and vice versa. The implications of this finding for people who ride unfamiliar horses is significant. Although the results showed impairments in the ‘stop’ and go responses to be associated with behaviour problems, rather than the cause of them, a simple in-hand assessment of a horse’s behaviour can give a rider an indication of what problems they are more likely to encounter under saddle. It also demonstrates the importance of maintaining a horse’s training both in-hand and under-saddle. In-hand and under-saddle behaviours are closely linked, therefore it is logical to assume that horses that manifest problems in one area will inevitably show them in the other. Of all the ways a response can be dysfunctional, ‘delayed and heavy’ is associated with far more problem behaviours.